Common Sense University
  • About
  • Buried Treasures
    • Dick Lamm on Multiculturalism
  • Creators
  • Encouraging Books
  • Guidelines

Recent Posts

  • The results are in: Say good bye to the America we have loved
  • Election Day: This one will determine America’s future
  • One Week until E-Day: A clear Choice – It’s Mitt Romney
  • Two Weeks until E-Day: B. Obama – Our cowardly President
  • Three Weeks until E-Day: Joe Biden’s buffoonish behavior

Sponsors

RSS FOXNews.com

  • Parolee indicted in theft of Gold Rush jewelry box
  • Arizona sheriff's office profiles Latinos, federal judge rules
  • Boy Scouts approve plan to accept openly gay members
  • Journalist and author Haynes Johnson dies at 81
  • Woman feared Iowa kidnapping suspect's release

Affiliates

Add to Technorati Favorites Blog Flux Directory Blog Promotion Blog Directory Webmaster and SEO Forum Political Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory

BrightandEarlyblog

See Today's Blogiversaries

Categories

  • About Us
  • Campaigns
  • Conservative Politics
  • Constitutional
  • Current Events
  • Dangerous Iran
  • Dynamics of Oil
  • Education
  • Elections
  • Finance
  • Global Topics
  • Global Warming
  • Health Care
  • Hypocrisy
  • Immigration
  • Ozone Layer
  • Politics
  • Polls
  • Schools
  • Term Limits
  • Terrorism
  • Uncategorized
  • Unions
  • War in Iraq

Counter

Invoke Congressional Term Limits

October 26th, 2007 by admin

As a career, a seat in Congress becomes a conflict of interest. 

An incumbent who seeks re-election cannot freely vote his conscience, or his principles, for fear that he is going to offend some slice of the electorate, reducing his chances of re-election. 

Obviously, one way to correct this problem is to reduce or eliminate eligibility for re-election. In other words, establish either a one or two term limit on all offices in government. 

In all the the noise among the pundits, editorialists, and bloggers about the significance of any election, nowhere does anyone address the the most obvious characteristic – that the bulk of the failings of our American electoral system is due to careerism and long tenure in the body politic, particularly in Congress. 

No one has stood up and yelled “It’s about re-elections, stupid! Not issues!” 

No one seems to recognize that, in the desperate struggle to hold on to their extremely ‘cushy’ jobs, career politicians will vote, not on principle or merit, but on their ‘re-election odds’ only. 

Those that do it successfully, go on to lifelong tenure (e.g. Byrd, Kennedy, Stevens, Domenici, et al). Those who try to hold to principle invariably serve very short terms. 

In other words, if your first concern is re-election, rather than what is best for the country, you reap the rewards of a long tenure. Is this any way to run a country? 

The fundamental reason we need Congressional Term Limits is simply that Congress is no longer doing its job. Instead, it is working very hard at keeping its job. 

Of the many hot issues actually ‘debated’ by Congress and passed, most have been so chewed up, amended, and emasculated, that they are often not worth the paper they are written on. Congress will do anything it can to avoid making clear-cut decisions to get good legislation, in order not to offend or lose the voters they need for re-election. 

Some people would say that’s the way a democracy works, and to some degree that’s true, but that’s an oversimplification. Rather, what we are seeing is a Congressional class which is overwhelmingly committed to re-election first, all other considerations, especially good governance, last. This is true on both sides of the aisle. 

The best evidence of this is the fact that in two recent (‘02, ‘04) elections; Congressional incumbents won re-election at a 99% rate. Before 50 years ago, that rate was about 50-60%. Do you really believe that 99% of incumbents deserved re-election? In two successive elections? 

The ‘06 election was merely a bump in the road. Things have not changed. A great majority of the really long termers survived. They always will, thanks to gerrymandered districts, name recognition, and other incumbent advantages. We still have a virtually permanent Congress. 

How this has come about can be understood by examining Congressional voting patterns on the major issues in our current political environment, all of which are now routine, and all of which have arisen during the last part of the 20th century, as Congress has learned how to ‘game the system’. 

For example, and the following applies to both sides of the aisle: 

  • They don’t reform Soc Sec to get personal retirement accounts. They might lose voters for re-election 
  • They don’t reform health care to get personal medical accounts. They might lose voters for re-election 
  • They don’t stop earmarks, because they want to spend federal money for local votes for re-election 
  • They don’t vote school choice, because they want teacher’s union money for re-election 
  • They don’t vote for tort reform, because they want lawyer money for re-election 
  • They don’t vote for right-to-work, because they want union money for re-election 
  • They don’t want computer neutral redistricting, because they want safe seats for re-election 
  • They don’t deregulate campaign financing with instant disclosure, because they lose contributors for re-election 
  • They won’t lower taxes, because they won’t be able to vote irresponsible ‘goodies’ for re-election 
  • They won’t reduce the size of government, because that would reduce their control of voters for re-election 
  • Last, but not least, Congressional office has become a career livelihood, which is in itself, a conflict of interest, because incumbents become more interested in holding on to the job than passing good legislation. Unlimited reelections should not be allowed.

A great many state and local legislative offices are already term limited. Why not Congress??? 

This article was written by Nelson Walker, a guest contributor whose site shows his term limit knowledge. 

This article and others on Back to Common Sense are designed to provoke further thought and investigation.   It is not the intent for the articles to be politically biased. Sources are referenced in each article to encourage readers to delve into the supporting material.  We welcome all readers to participate with their point of view either in support or contrary with additional information sources.

Categories : Term Limits

Comments

  1. Steven Ouellette says:
    October 29, 2007 at 3:25 am

    I think we just need to take away the salary. Be like it was back in the day, when the farmers and other workers would come up for session because and do the government bidding and then head back down once that was over to work. That in all could eliminate many of the congressional problems we face here today.

    Reply
  2. Congressional Term Limits??? « says:
    November 4, 2007 at 8:15 pm

    [...] written by Mr. Nelson Walker, a guest contributor wherein he made very strong arguments in favor of Congressional Term Limits. In fact, we fully agree with all the points he made and would encourage you to read his article [...]

    Reply
  3. » It is Time for Congressional Term Limits! says:
    January 17, 2008 at 1:02 pm

    [...] written by Mr. Nelson Walker, a guest contributor wherein he made very strong arguments in favor of Congressional Term Limits. In fact, we fully agree with all the points he made and would encourage you to read his article [...]

    Reply
  4. Jeff Sandford says:
    March 3, 2008 at 6:49 pm

    The idea posed here that congressmen vote according to ensure re-election, although seemingly intuitive, is not factually sound.

    The truth is that public opinion is often so fragmented within many districts that it is impossible for congressional representatives to please a certain majority, which leads to representatives from “marginal districts” voting based on their ideology.

    In fact, when considering most representative’s voting record, the votes tend to align to either the liberal or conservative spectrum, consistently. This means that on a majority of issues, even representatives from districts where re-election is not certain will vote based on their political alignment, not on the basis of their re-election.

    In fact, re-election occurs moreso as a result of the beneifts provided to representatives than the length of their terms. There is no denying that, at the present time, rates of incumbency are indeed quite high; however, the institution of congressional term limits would likely only affect the statistics of the matter. Incumbents would still be offered overwhelming benefits through heightened media exposure, the franking privelege and constituency services and would thus still likely retain office in most situations, pending possibility as per the law.

    Thus, even though incumbents would only be allowed to serve a specified number of terms, they would still likely serve the maximum due to their inherent campaigning benefits. Even so, their eventual replacements would also vote attitudinally and not representationally, in accordance with the trends of an increasingly idealogical Congress.

    Also, an increased frequency of freshman representatives would ensure the higher probability of a divided government, facilitating gridlock and still preventing the passing of any profound legislation.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Important Contact Information

Your Senator's Phone Number!

Pages

  • About
  • Buried Treasures
    • Dick Lamm on Multiculturalism
  • Creators
  • Encouraging Books
  • Guidelines

RSS FOXNews.com

  • Paula Broadwell apologizes for Petraeus affair
  • Consultant takes blame after Anthony Weiner campaign site shows Pittsburgh skyline, not NYC's
  • Holder probing Holder? Obama orders DOJ review over search warrant AG likely approved
  • Holder, Heal Thyself
  • IRS official who refused to testify, resign signed Tea Party letters in 2012

RSS Liberty Pundits

  • Malcolm & Melissa #106: Elizabeth Scalia Talks About Her Book Strange Gods: The Idols We Make Of Ourselves
    Author Elizabeth Scalia joins Andrew Malcolm and Melissa Clouthier to discuss the cult of self and the idols we put before God. She speaks of the god of coolness, sex, technology, and ideology and how they’re robbing people of relationship not only to God but to each other. Buy the book here. […]
  • Malcolm & Melissa #105: Scandalpalooza – Which Obama Scandal Is Worst? Benghazi, IRS, AP Wiretapping?
    National Review Online’s Jim Geraghty answers the question: Which scandal is worst for Democrats and America? A positive spin by Jim! […]
  • Malcolm & Melissa #104: Plumbing the Obama poll numbers you won’t find in the MSM
    This week M&M talk again with IBD’s senior earth-vexing varlet Terry Jones to biopsy the latest monthly IBD poll. (Historically among the nation’s most accurate, btw.) He finds surprising – and for conservatives, encouraging – news buried within. For one thing, the crucial sector of independents, long an Obama strong-suit, are falling away in droves, [.. […]
  • Malcolm & Melissa #103: Gosnell, Benghazi, and bring on the pain
    Kermit Gosnell, a botched Benghazi (and covered up) and the anticipation of locusts: Malcolm and Melissa look at a society going down the toilet and the man who is making it happen. […]
  • Malcolm & Melissa #102:
    In case you missed it! […]

Blogroll

  • Documentation
  • Plugins
  • Suggest Ideas
  • Support Forum
  • Themes
  • WordPress Blog
  • WordPress Planet

Hosted by:

After much looking I found Bluehost to offer the best deal and service, and am completely pleased.

Archives

  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
Common Sense University
Copyright © 2013 All Rights Reserved
iThemes Builder by iThemes
Powered by WordPress